|
#71
|
||
|
__________________
Cuthbert Blackie - Freetrading Extraordinaire |
|
|
|
||
|
#72
|
||
|
Well when you get some say in your faction come back to the table with something of more substance than the tired and well worn, "Save the Whales" rhetoric of greenpeace. Here is a novel what if. What If the Spanish were to make a move on France? What would really happen? How would the dynamics of Roberts change?
At the moment the Spanish and French have been using the "We must attack the British in order to survive"... I can understand how at the start of the world this was true. Now however we are seeing thanks to Hovis and his refurbished soapbox that the Spanish are simply doing you French a favor. If the French were as concerned about their survival as they claim to be and the Spanish truly sympathetic to the needs of the entire server we could get a few Society leaders to sit down and hammer out a true agreement that would stablize Roberts for the short term and allow us to equally build up our factions and still open up PvP zones until we get a better population balance around the time zones and more patches. Of course this is just a pipe dream and I need to just say no to drugs. ![]()
__________________
Captain L. Horatio Hawke M.G Post Captain Retired |
|
|
|
||
|
#73
|
|||
|
Quote:
And winning here is pointless and will have no value. Worse ! Using lame tactics against those who give this server an interest will just kill the last server standing. Killing fun just for a pointless victory. How smart it is ! |
||
|
|
|||
|
#74
|
||
|
You know, I to have to agree with Lord Hawke initial statement. I could not care less about the Spanish, French and Pirate nation. I know that this is most likely not healthy for the game overall, but screw that.
And that is basically the same attitude the French and Spanish have shown towards the British from Day one. I am not sure whether it was Hovis or Calmdown, who basically said "We are stomping on the British hard and every player leaving the game due to it should not have picked up the game anyways". Or how often have we heard the ***** statement "In war everything is allowed for easy points". So stop playing the holy prophet telling us to stop certain things for the good of the game. You have given up the ****** right to do so a long time ago. So yes, as long as the Brits are being ***** off anything is fine, hey, we have to take care of the French, screw the biggest fraction, the are supposed to stay in the corner, be quiet and be a nice little puppy the others can stamp on. And yes, I am furious right now by this hipocrisy, screw my Swiss neutrality. |
|
|
|
||
|
#75
|
||
|
Tell you what , i might let you survive a port battle if you beg nicely.
|
|
|
|
||
|
#76
|
|||
|
Quote:
I think we are at the point of the card game where we need to show some cards and stop bluffing.
__________________
Captain L. Horatio Hawke M.G Post Captain Retired |
||
|
|
|||
|
#77
|
|||
|
Quote:
1. We'd need to run out of easy British targets. So basically when we've got the Yucatan back for a start. 2. Some sort of provocation from the French, or better yet a bilateral declaration of war. Keep it civilised, or at least keep it clear who was throwing the first punch. 3. We'd have to be confident the British wouldn't take the opportunity to give us all the bum's rush. That basically means breaking the British backs, because last time they made a come back they nearly took the server. 4. We'd have to be sure that France could take the hit. It's not worth breaking the game over a map win we'll probably get anyway. Strategically we get three red zones, and they have to be used on the British. One zone is sort of our spare zone, to put where we like, then we need to use two zones at once to be certain of capturing one port every couple of days, which offsets the damage done by the British ninja teams. If we used our third zone, on it's own, against France that's not going to do much more than start a full blown war, a war which with only one zone in play we'd not be able to win. To start a new war with France we'd want to hit them with all three zones at once, but to do that we have to lose ports to the British. It's pretty much a no win to attack France, or at least it's a not-substantial-enough win. If we get to the point any time soon that we can go head to head with the British in prime time and be certain of victory then we'd not have to take the belt and braces double-attack approach, but of course when that day does come you're already screwed, because your port battle force is your greatest asset.
__________________
Gief boats k |
||
|
|
|||
|
#78
|
||
|
There is no bluff, we don't care about winning, if we did, we would have rolled on an US server and did the same to them you do to us.
We want a balanced server with FUN battles. The way you play the game is not fun at all. And I can't speak for all french people but its likely you are going to play it alone soon the way it goes. I agree it's not your problem if the game dies because of your actions. I'm just pretty surprised to see FLS making Seppukku allowing it. Well, there's enough MMO s running, when they are dead i am still playing. |
|
|
|
||
|
#79
|
||
|
Yay! He does have a spine after all. You can has a cookie.
__________________
Gief boats k |
|
|
|
||
|
#80
|
|||
|
Quote:
But oh wait , you really DO care about winning , or you would have done so already. |
||
|
|
|||
![]() |
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:20 AM.
Copyright © = date('Y'); ?> Portalus Games LLC. All rights reserved.








Linear Mode
