Veterans, MoVs & Pb Queues

[Josh_Brown]

Originally Posted by Sensou.Shichiya I do not understand this sentiment, that there should be a guaranteed attendance to PB's. The only way to really balance out a win-streak is by more inexperienced people joining the battles. This kind of system would just put more inexperienced people (those people that needs to see action the most) on the bottom of the pyramid. This system is also subject to abuse, and open up xteaming sabotage to a much higher and easier extent than before. Make a few alts in other nations, give them the MoV's for turn-ins, let them camp the turn-in man, be the first to turn it in, secure your invite, and click out once the battle have started. "Where did 6 of our men go?"

Originally Posted by PaulG Don't like this idea, it is elitist. You want a place in the battle then earn it like the rest of us. I appreciate the lottery system can through out some weird invites but this is not the answer for me.

Originally Posted by Temmypoos imo this idea is bad, because it doesnt reward those who flipped the port, just those with movs to spare.

Originally Posted by benryan1 So first 24 that pay get in right? What if flip takes 5 hours, you're there for the first 4.30 of the flip by the time you log back in 24 people have paid 5 movs. Doesn't sound as fair as the current system where that person at least has as reasonable chance as anyone except for the real grind addicts who of course will be able to buy 5 movs and goal hang to pay those movs, nothing gained. Leave it as it is i'd say.

I'd contribute more of a response, but it's already been said. I don't think this is a good idea.

[ARobertsFrenchie]

Originally Posted by GM Sasquatch You can request escalation on any ticket. For crossteaming tickets, it is often the case that something appears as crossteaming, but isn't. Accusations of crossteaming are taken very seriously, but thinking someone should be banned because you saw something you think is crossteaming is not enough. If, after investigation, we find evidence of crossteaming, the crossteamers are banned.

What is considered evidence that would support a ban?

[GM Sasquatch]

We don't discuss this. The reason should be obvious.

[ARobertsFrenchie]

The reason being there not being any evidence that would qualify?

It's pretty easy, for every other rule it's clear cut. You dupe ships, you get caught and punished. You spam chat, you get caught and punished.

But for this offense, which actually concerns more people than any other offense I've seen in 14 years of online gaming, you can't even tell us what is considered breaking the rule to begin with?

If we don't know what to look for, how can we possibly report people who are doing it?

How about a different question: How many accounts have you banned over the last 6 months for crossteaming?

[nickdddd]

Like he's gonna answer that...

I always thought it should be first come first serve, people that get last minute points should be last in line and those that attend the flip should be first in line