Not logged in | Log In
Pirates of the Burning Sea logo
 
 
Pirates of the Burning Sea Forums > The Shipyard > Shipwright Discussion
Click here to Log In

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-21-2012, 10:53 AM
Join Date: Jan 2011
Server: Antigua
Society: SnD
Nation: Pirate, French
Career: Mercenary
 
Post New First Rates (your ship ideas)

Here you can list ships that you think can be modeled and used in the game.

Santisima Trinidad 1769


History of the ship

Built Havana in 1769 by Mateo Mullan, Pedro de Acosta and Ignacio Mullan. There is no complete plan
of this ship exist, but there is 112-gun ship plan of 1765 exist, which might be found the orginal dimensions of the ship : (the next dimension are in feet of the burgos (278,6mm), and metres.)
lenght = 213 2/3 (59,53), keel= 182 5/12 (50,82), beam= 57 3/4 (16,09), depth= 28 11/12 (8,06).

Orginally ship was planned to 112,116 or 118- gun ship, but actually was first carried 120 guns
(30-36, 32-24, 32-18, 26-8 pdr.)
In 1795 the ship dimensions were = 220 1/2 (61,43), 186 (51,82), 58 1/3 (16,25), 28 3/4 (8,01).

At the same time the armament was increased to 134 guns (36-32, 34-24, 36-12, 18-8, 10-24mortars), .
When Santisima Trinidad was damaged in the battle of ``Cape St Vicent" (1797) the ship was built a fourth gun deck, and in 1799 the armament was 136 guns (32-36, 34-24, 36-12, 18-8, 10-24mortars,
and 6 esmeriles).
Then before the ship last battle of ``Trafalgar" (1805) there was mounted other four mortars in the high deck, which raised the guns number to 140-guns.
Battle of Trafalgar the ship has crew of 1048 men, which 205 killed, and 108 wounded in battle.
Santisima Trinidad was captured battle of Trafalgar, but sunk in storm, which followed the battle.

What do you think?

There are many pictures and plans all around net.
Reply With Quote
Storm Hunter is offline Add to ignore list
  #2  
Old 01-21-2012, 11:30 AM
Join Date: Oct 2011
 
Default

Santissima Trinidad has already been rejected several times. It is a massive hulk of a ship which would be nearly impossible to implement in a manner that is both historically accurate and properly balanced. In addition, it is also outside the approved period which ship plans must originate from which (correct me if I am wrong) is 1660-1740. De Zeven Provincien is the only ship of the first or second rate class which was previously provisionally approved and has not been fully modelled and introduced. It currently exists as a Community Project which was, last I checked, headed by KrisWood, but has seen little or no progress in several years, as far as I am aware.
Reply With Quote
Mordin Solus is offline Add to ignore list
  #3  
Old 01-21-2012, 03:47 PM
acerrak
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Server: Antigua
Career: Forum Troll
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordin Solus View Post
Santissima Trinidad has already been rejected several times. It is a massive hulk of a ship which would be nearly impossible to implement in a manner that is both historically accurate and properly balanced. In addition, it is also outside the approved period which ship plans must originate from which (correct me if I am wrong) is 1660-1740. De Zeven Provincien is the only ship of the first or second rate class which was previously provisionally approved and has not been fully modelled and introduced. It currently exists as a Community Project which was, last I checked, headed by KrisWood, but has seen little or no progress in several years, as far as I am aware.
there are some ships in the game that are not based on any real ship. i believe the mont blonc is one of them.

they took a concept of a ship design and made there own. so what is the difference if someone took a concept of this ship and made there own.
Reply With Quote
acerrak is offline Add to ignore list
  #4  
Old 01-21-2012, 05:49 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Server: Antigua
Society: Rackem's Raiders
Nation: Pirate
Career: Cutthroat
 
Default

HMS Victory

I know that this ship was built a little bit later then the games time period (1660-1740). It was launched 25 years after but it's a really nice ship and some exceptions have already been done for some ships. HMS Victory was built between 1759-1765.

Info
Builder: Chatham Dockyard
Launched: 7 May 1765
Class & Type: 104-gun First Rate Ship of the Line
Displacement: 3500 tons
Length: 227 ft
Complement: 850

Game
My thought was that this ship should have more guns but less armor and hull. I've counted the gunports on the images. Many gunports gives support for more guns, but also weakens the armor.

Class & Type: 118-gun First Rate Ship of the Line

Hull: 2800
Port: 1800
Stbd: 1800
Bow: 1100
Stern: 550
Sails: 4125

Swivels: 4x1/2lb
Topdeck: 16x10lb
Upperdeck: 30x16lb
Middeck: 30x32lb
Gundeck: 32x40lb
Fore gun: 2x12lb
Aft gun: 4x36lb


What do you think?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	5731bae34529635caeb380e8519.jpg
Views:	225
Size:	2.61 MB
ID:	52431  Click image for larger version

Name:	7-victory4-69-1024570175.jpg
Views:	231
Size:	334.4 KB
ID:	52432  Click image for larger version

Name:	Victory_starboard.JPG
Views:	157
Size:	1.91 MB
ID:	52433  Click image for larger version

Name:	HMS_Victory_-_bow.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	4.48 MB
ID:	52434  Click image for larger version

Name:	HMS_Victory-stern_view.JPG
Views:	183
Size:	1.39 MB
ID:	52435  

__________________
Rector Barbossa
Reply With Quote
CaptBarbossa93 is offline Add to ignore list

Last edited by CaptBarbossa93 : 01-22-2012 at 02:20 AM.
  #5  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:27 PM
Join Date: Jan 2012
 
Default

French ship Orient (1791)

The Dauphin-Royal was an Océan class 118-gun ship of the line of the French Navy.
During the French Revolution, she was renamed Sans-Culotte in September 1792, and eventually Orient in May 1795.
She carried Napoleon to his invasion of Egypt, in which the French fleet narrowly avoided discovery by Nelson's fleet. If it had been discovered, Orient would have been a major target for the British ships and Napoleon's life would have been in considerable danger.
She was the flagship of the French fleet at the Battle of the Nile in August 1798. After receiving heavy fire from numerous British ships, she was set aflame. Eventually, the fire reached her powder magazine, and she blew up, with the loss of most of her crew, including her captain, Luc-Julien-Joseph Casabianca and his young son - giving rise to the memorable poem Casabianca by Felicia Hemans which begins ... "The boy stood on the burning deck".
After the Battle of Trafalgar, Viscount Horatio Nelson was put in a coffin carved from a piece of the main mast of Orient, which had been taken back to England for this purpose.

Displacement: 5 095 tonnes
Length: 65,18 metres (196,6 French feet)
Beam: 16,24 metres (50 French feet)
Draught: 8,12 metres (25 French feet)
Propulsion: sail, 3 265 m²
Complement: 1 079 men
Armament: Upper deck: 34 x 12-pounder guns
Middle deck: 34 x 24-pounder guns
Lower deck: 32 x 36-pounder guns
Quarterdeck and Forecastle:
18 x 8-pounder guns, 6 x 36-pounder carronades
Armour: Wood
Reply With Quote
Willy H Bonney is offline Add to ignore list
  #6  
Old 01-21-2012, 06:35 PM
Join Date: Sep 2011
Server: Antigua
Society: Saint George Squadron of the White
Nation: British
Career: Naval Officer
 
Default

Look, guys - I know you want the look of the Line of Battle ships from the Napoleonic War period, with the straight sides, smooth decks et all. NOT from our period - the doctrines that led to them being built, and the ongoing learning of the shipwrights that had to learn how to build ships that could handle the weight, position and other naval architect determinations for them were still being developed. Try some ships from our period. There were very sound reasons for the high sterns, severe tumblehome and other features of our period.
__________________
Captain Fitzroy Henry Lee, esquire

Unique, HAH!
Reply With Quote
Thorin Eikinskjald is offline Add to ignore list
  #7  
Old 01-21-2012, 08:13 PM
Join Date: Jan 2008
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thorin Eikinskjald View Post
Look, guys - I know you want the look of the Line of Battle ships from the Napoleonic War period, with the straight sides, smooth decks et all. NOT from our period - the doctrines that led to them being built, and the ongoing learning of the shipwrights that had to learn how to build ships that could handle the weight, position and other naval architect determinations for them were still being developed. Try some ships from our period. There were very sound reasons for the high sterns, severe tumblehome and other features of our period.
We need a like button...
Reply With Quote
KrisWood is offline Add to ignore list
  #8  
Old 01-22-2012, 02:17 AM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Server: Antigua
Society: Rackem's Raiders
Nation: Pirate
Career: Cutthroat
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisWood View Post
We need a like button...
KrisWood, you are in the 3D Steering; If the HMS Victory was built between 1759-1765, does really the 25 years (1765 - 1740 = 25) matter so much? It's actually "only" 25 years after and I belive that there's already many ships ingame that was finnished somwere between 1740-1750, which makes it even shorter. It's a such beautiful ship. 25 years?
__________________
Rector Barbossa
Reply With Quote
CaptBarbossa93 is offline Add to ignore list
  #9  
Old 01-22-2012, 02:25 AM
Join Date: May 2011
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptBarbossa93 View Post
KrisWood, you are in the 3D Steering; If the HMS Victory was built between 1759-1765, does really the 25 years (1765 - 1740 = 25) matter so much?
It was "launched" in 1765, but it was immediately put in reserve for 13 years and commissioned for use in 1778. It was a ship far ahead of its time too. FLS have already rejected it, so you might as well give up.

Personally I think the Victory is an ugly ship. It looks like a big bathtub, no grace in its appearance at all.
Reply With Quote
Blast Hardcheese is offline Add to ignore list

Last edited by Blast Hardcheese : 01-22-2012 at 02:30 AM.
  #10  
Old 01-22-2012, 07:05 AM
kovaloo
 
kovaloo's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2008
Server: Roberts
Society: United Polish Navy
Nation: British
Career: Working Class
 
Default

Well i think that ships could be perfect for timeframe: French 1 Rate Royal Luis and Soleil Royale

here what wiki says:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_...al_Louis_(1692)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_...il-Royal_(1670)
1 rate british: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Britannia_(1682)
2 rate british : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Duke_(1682)

generally my idea is that could be perfect that every nation could use only "own" lineships.
For example French:that ones ,Brtis: HMS Triumph and similar and Spanish had some as well dunno what names...what u think ?
__________________
Support 17-23 GMT Roberts Port Battle slot!
Rekrutacja do UPN trwa! Zapraszamy rodakow do wspolnej zabawy!
Reply With Quote
kovaloo is offline Add to ignore list

Last edited by kovaloo : 01-22-2012 at 07:17 AM.
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.